Prioritizing Research Informing Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guidelines for Knee Arthroplasty Patients

To apply value-of-information (VOI) analysis to quantify the value of conducting further clinical research to reduce decision uncertainty regarding the cost-effectiveness of AP strategies for dental patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Clinical practice guidelines
Economic evaluation
Evidence-based dentistry/health care
Outcomes research
Joint disease
Quality of life
Authors

Kuntz KM

Alarid-Escudero F

Swiontkowski M

Skaar DD

Published

July 17, 2022

Recommended citation

Kuntz KM, Alarid-Escudero F, Swiontkowski M, Skaar DD. Prioritizing research informing antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines for knee arthroplasty patients. JDR Clinical & Translational Research, 2022;7(3):298-306.

   

Published in Clinical Infectious Diseases

 

Abstract

 

Objectives

To apply value-of-information (VOI) analysis to quantify the value of conducting further clinical research to reduce decision uncertainty regarding the cost-effectiveness of AP strategies for dental patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

 

Methods

An updated decision model and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) evaluated the cost-effectiveness of AP and decision uncertainty for 3 AP strategies: no AP, 2-y AP, and lifetime AP. VOI analyses estimated the value and cost of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or observational study. We used a linear regression meta-modeling approach to calculate the population expected value of partial perfect information and a Gaussian approximation to calculate population expected value of sample information, and we subtracted the cost for research to obtain the expected net benefit of sampling (ENBS). We determined the optimal trial sample sizes that maximized ENBS.

 

Results

Using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the PSA found that a no-AP strategy had the highest expected net benefit, with a 60% probability of being cost-effective, and 2-y AP had a 37% probability. The optimal sample size for an RCT to determine AP efficacy and dental-related PJI risk would require approximately 421 patients per arm with an estimated cost of $14.7 million. The optimal sample size for an observational study to inform quality-of-life parameters would require 2,211 patients with an estimated cost of $1.2 million. The 2 trial designs had an ENBS of approximately $25 to $26 million.

 

Conclusions

Given the uncertainties associated with AP guidelines for dental patients after TKA, we conclude there is value in conducting further research to inform the risk of PJI, effectiveness of AP, and quality-of-life values.